This passage struck me strongly:
"Because we are made in God's image, we have built into our makeup an infinite capacity for love. Loving your child and even doing things to show your love do not translate into a secure love.
Secure love is a steady and sure love that is written on the hard drive of children's souls. It's a complete love that they default to when their hearts are under attack. It's the kind of love that children can confidently carry with them into the future. "
I was stunned and humbled by a quote from author Dan Allender, which Kimmel shared in the later part of his book:
Honesty is the commitment to see reality as it is, without conscious distortions, minimization, or spiritualization. Honesty begins by admitting we are deceived, and that we would rather construct a false world than face the bright, searing light of truth. An honest person acknowledges his fondness for vague, half-truths that neither require change nor rip away the presumption of self-sufficiency.
Why must we admit what is true? Because dishonesty, or living in denial, is actually an attempt to dethrone God. it is an attempt to become as God with the power to construct the world and reality according to our desire. A person committed to denying hard truths must construct an alternate world and, then, like Atlas, keep it spinning on her own power. The creation of a false world is really an attempt to shut God out of our world. It's much like the child who says, "Unless you play by my rules, I'll take my ball and bat and go home." God does not play by our rules nor resolve our wound and ache as we desire; therefore, we leave God's world and create one that is more palatable to our taste, even if it robs us of life and love.These two sentences late in the book mystified me and provoked me to deep thought:
"The graceless home requires kids to be good and gets angry and punishes them when they are bad. The grace-based home assumes kids will struggle with sin and helps them learn how to tap into God's power to help them get stronger."
The book speaks very specifically to children's needs and to parents' responsibilities, but it does not tell you HOW to do things. That's part of its beauty - it recognizes every child is different, every parent is different, every family is different. Instead the author encourages the reader to look at our circumstances through the eyes of principle, while being prayerfully creative about how to accomplish what God wants for us.
So... having finally finished this book (and its somewhat irritatingly arduous note-taking), it was time to start another book, and I had two waiting for me....
We have a little neighborhood free library three blocks from us, and in the year we've lived here I've left two or three books in the small, glass-front, peak-roofed box for neighbors, and picked up three for myself.
The first one I took was The Plague and I by Betty McDonald. I spied it in the box in March and pulled it out. I'd heard of the book from my mother-in-law but knew nothing about it. Turns out this is the same Betty McDonald of Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle fame, and Plague is one of her autobiographical works. I could hear the voice of Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle as I read about her experiences in a tuberculosis sanitarium, and was delighted to discover that the author was a resident of Seattle in the 1940s when she wrote Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle. As my sister gave Anne her first two Mrs. Piggle-Wiggle books shortly thereafter in April, I have a new appreciation for the setting and surroundings of the author as I read these truly delightful stories to my five-year-old. Plague was a real page-turner for me, although maybe I am easily delighted when it comes to compelling stories....
Back to the current November, I had the second book I'd pulled from the free library waiting for me, and it was A Wrinkle in Time, which has risen to new heights in popularity due to the fairly recent movie (which I have not seen and am not in the market to see). I had read Wrinkle in childhood on the recommendation of my close friend Laura, and I don't think I appreciated it as much as she did. Upon rereading it last weekend while nursing a tired baby (I was surprised how much of the plot and details I hadn't remembered), I definitely understood it better. Now I get that it is a theological exploration of the battle between Good and Evil. However, it still stretched my mind in terms of the science-fiction aspect of the fantasy, perhaps a bit beyond where my mind wanted to go. Science fiction interested me a little as a child, but it has never been my favorite genre, and has since fallen in favor with myself. For that reason, I will always prefer Narnia or the Ring when it comes to theology in literature. However, I enjoyed it enough that I would like to continue the series.
The third book from the free library I'd been considering taking for some months, but had never gotten up the nerve. Most of the books in the box are sort of chick-lit gossip stuff, which I don't have the time or the will to read. The book in question is a semi-autobiographical novel by Willa Cather, which I knew was definitely NOT in that category, but beyond knowing she was a well-regarded author from a long time ago, I had nothing to go on. However, in a recent Strings magazine, which I usually skim at best, I enjoyed an article on David Hochstein, written in honor of the 100th anniversary of his death. He was a violin prodigy from Rochester who was killed in WWI, and his friends organized a community music school in honor of him. That's where I taught for the first four years of our marriage. In the article, I learned that Hochstein was acquainted with Cather, and there were quotes from her writing which made me want to read her work. Finally I took the book from behind the latched door, and now I've started reading it. The writing is so rich and vivid, descriptive and colorful. The plot runs in refreshingly human time, and I am so intrigued by the pace of life a century or more ago in a small town in the Colorado desert. My mom always said when I was a child, that I was born in the wrong century on account of my fascination with "the olden days." As an adult, I have a more mature view on that statement, but it is still true that I seem to see and do things differently than a lot of my peers. In reading this novel, I am temporarily in love with and nostalgic for a time I never lived in - with an incredibly different pace of life and an entirely different set of expectations which I almost can't fathom. I appreciate the author's grittiness and also how her more timely perception of the "olden days" were both more and less sexist and proper than I had imagined. I am also finding it to be a page-turner.

