First of all, I personally don't like guns. They were designed for one reason, and that is to kill, or at the very least to threaten and intimidate. I also don't like having poison around for some of the same reasons. Ditto, mouse traps. I just don't like having objects designed to kill around me, although I realize that there are legitimate reasons for owning and using lethal-intention items (and I'm referring to products targeting both animals and people here). They're just not for me, if I can help it.
However, I know that many people like to use guns for sport. Shooting at the target range is a fun hobby. And some people like collecting guns, because they are into history. Also, some people hunt for the purpose of feeding their families more healthfully and more humanely. And, unfortunately, guns have become a necessary part of law enforcement and military forces around the world. I wish there were no need for law enforcement and soldiers to have firepower, but I don't deny that it's mandatory.
There is a thought floating around that guns don't kill people, people kill people. And there's that billboard that I'm sure we've all seen recently which says, "Cain killed Abel with a rock. It's a heart problem, not a gun problem. Jeremiah 17:9" And frankly, I can't agree more!
(I do want to point out a couple of differences between rocks and guns, though. Rocks were designed by God as part of our planet, and also, as part of many other planets and heavenly bodies. Because they are God's creation, they are inherently beautiful. We can learn about geology and paleontology from them. Also, we can use rocks for many constructive purposes - roads, buildings, and bridges to name some obvious ones. On the other hand, guns were invented by humans after the Fall. They are engineered, some better than others, for the purpose of hitting a target and doing great damage to it - basically to injure or kill.)
That aside, I think we also all agree that we live in a society filled with people who have heart problems. I am one of them. Even the best of us have some pretty nasty moments.
So now I am imagining I am sitting in a church, or standing in line at the post office, or enjoying some entertainment at the theater, or studying in a classroom, or out to dinner with my family. And someone with a heart problem shows up. Not just any heart problem. Specifically a murderous rage of a heart problem. Do I wish that the person had a rock or a gun? Well, frankly neither. I also wish that the person didn't have a blanket, a piece of wire, a chair, a crowbar, a knife, or even bare hands. However, if I were forced to pick, I'd pick the rock over the gun every time. That's because if someone is planning on mass killings in public, they may not have even finished off their first victim with a rock before getting jumped. Depending on the type of gun (and maybe this is where we should all think carefully), the killer could knock off a whole host of people in a few seconds before being neutralized. If I have to pick between one dead and fifteen dead, I'd rather pick no one dead. But if I'm forced to make that choice, I'd go with one over the fifteen.
And if I had to pick one dead, I'd hope it was me rather than the other fifteen, because although a bloody death is NOT my dream, I know I can trust the Lord for a beautiful future in a resurrected body, and I'd like to create every opportunity for someone else to live long enough to know the wonder of Jesus, too.
The upshot of all that is that certain types of guns make mass killings much more possible than other types of weapons commonly available do.
So are mass shootings just going to be the norm now? Maybe. Seems like it.
Here are some statistics to consider. I culled these from the Washington Post, and I learned quite a few things while doing it. The number next to each country is the number of gun homicides per 100,000 people.
Honduras 68.43
El Salvador 39.9
Venezuela 38.97
Guatemala 38.41
St. Kitts and Nevis 32.44
Trinidad and Tobago 27.31
Columbia 27.09
Belize 21.82
That list turns out to mostly be countries in Central America with major humanitarian crises going on, where people are literally dying to escape to more civilized countries like the US. In some places armed gangs have taken over the government. Definitely we don't want to be like them.
Puerto Rico 18.3
Brazil 18.1
South Africa 17.03
Dominican Republic 16.3
Panama 16.18
Bahamas 15.37
Ecuador 12.73
Guyana 11.46
Mexico 9.97
Philipines 8.93
Paraguay 7.35
Anguilla 7.14
Nicaragua 5.92
St. Vincent and the Grenadines 5.49
Zimbabwe 4.78
Costa Rica 4.59
So that's a list of the middle countries. It's a list of places we consider to be very inequitable, and many of them unsafe, although some of them have great "safe zones" for tourists. These are all places we do lots of mission work and humanitarian aid. Don't want the US to be on that list either.
Here are some countries with the fewest gun deaths per 100,000 people:
Iceland 0
Hong Kong 0
Japan 0.01
Singapore 0.02
South Korea 0.03
Norway 0.05
France 0.06
England and Wales 0.07
Israel 0.09
Australia 0.14
New Zealand 0.16
Germany 0.19
Spain 0.2
Austria 0.22
Northern Ireland 0.28
Sweden 0.41
Finland 0.45
Canada 0.51
Italy 0.71
This list of countries has a wide variety of cultures, and differing types of governments, and all kinds of middling to high GDP's, they have some of the lowest gun homicide rates in the world. And mostly they are countries which we think of as orderly, well educated, advanced, safe, and pleasant places to live.
Here is a list which contains the US and countries with relatively similar gun homicide rates:
United States of America 3.2
Argentina 3.02
Barbados 2.99
West Bank and Gaza 2.95
Liechtenstein 2.82
Uruguay 2.8
Peru 2.63
Sierra Leone 2.28
Peru 1.63
Maldives 1.63
Democratic Republic of Congo 1.56
Cambodia 1.44
Kazakhstan 1.34
Ok, so I'm not "place-ist", but it does seem that the US and Liechtenstein are outliers on this list. Most of these places we don't associate with equity, well-being, easy access to healthcare, or great advances in the arts and sciences... And it's worth noting that the gun homicide rate in the US is twice that of Peru. So although the numbers look close, you're actually twice as likely to be murdered at gunpoint here than in Peru.
I realize this is a very complex issue with spiritual, moral, ethical, religious, social, societal, cultural, and political components.
I hope that you're not happy with the US gun homicide rate. And I hope that you have some ideas in any of the aforementioned realms about working for improvement. I don't want to hear party rhetoric from either side, but I do want to hear honest and creative thoughts from you.

















